Etienne P. LeBel, PhD

Independent Meta-Scientist, KU Leuven

I investigate the credibility of scientific research, focusing on the field of psychology. My current efforts are focused on Curate Science, a web platform to label and link the transparency and replication of scientific findings (think food labels for science). I previously lead PsychDisclosure.org, a grassroots transparency initiative that contributed to raising reporting standards at leading journals in psychology. My background is in social psychology where I examined racial biases/prejudice and methodological issues in psychology research (e.g., metric calibration; measurement issues related to replicability, hypothesis testing, and construct validity).
Peer-Reviewed Articles & Chapters
Conceptual
A brief guide to evaluate replications
EP LeBel, W Vanpaemel, I Cheung, & L Campbell (in press)
Meta-Psychology
1K 20

1.5K
Preprint
Conceptual
A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings
EP LeBel, R McCarthy, B Earp, M Elson, & W Vanpaemel (2018)
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
23

1.4K
Preprint
Conceptual
Falsifiability is not optional
EP LeBel, D Berger, L Campbell, & TJ Loving (2017)
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Public Code
20
15

3.6K 496
Preprint
683
Preprint
Conceptual
Benefits of open and high-powered research outweigh costs
EP LeBel, L Campbell, & TJ Loving (2017)
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Public Code
21
3

5K
HTML
268
Preprint
Commentary
Complex phenomena require sophisticated designs: Why we shouldn't give up on replicability
M Heino, EI Fried, & EP LeBel (2017)
Frontiers in Psychology
Conceptual
Psychological and institutional obstacles toward more transparent reporting of psychological science
EP LeBel & L John (2017)
Psychological Science Under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions. S. O. Lilienfeld & I. D. Waldman (Eds.) New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
1K 24

HTML
Replication 16 Registered Report
Registered Replication Report of Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon's (2002) Study 1
I Cheung, L Campbell, EP LeBel, ... , & JC Yong (2016)
Perspectives on Psychological Science

Preregistration
357
Public Study Materials
209
Public Data
32
Public Code
56
Reporting Standards
Study complies with the Basic 4 (at submission) reporting standard:
  1. Excluded data (subjects/observations): Full details reported in article.
  2. Experimental conditions: Full details reported in article.
  3. Outcome measures: Full details reported in article.
  4. Sample size determination: Full details reported in article.
Commentaries 1
346 10

2K
HTML
Conceptual
A new replication norm for psychology
EP LeBel (2015)
Collabra
65K 2.7K

12K
Preprint
Replication 100
Estimating the [replicability] of psychological science
AA Aarts, ... , EP LeBel, ... , & BA Nosek (2015)
Science

Public Study Materials
Public Data
Public Code
Reporting Standards
Study complies with the Basic 4 (at submission) reporting standard:
  1. Excluded data (subjects/observations): Full details reported in article.
  2. Experimental conditions: Full details reported in article.
  3. Outcome measures: Full details reported in article.
  4. Sample size determination: Full details reported in article.
5

1K 73
Preprint
Replication 2
Replication difficulties of Correll's (2008) modulation of 1/f noise in a racial bias task
C Madurski* & EP LeBel (2015) *Student co-author
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Preregistration
Study 1

Study 2
Public Study Materials
Study 1

Study 2
Public Data
Study 1

Study 2
Public Code
Study 1

Study 2
Reporting Standards
Study 1 complies with the Basic 4 (retroactive) reporting standard.
Study 2 complies with the Basic 4 (retroactive) reporting standard.
Conceptual
Madness in the method: Fatal flaws in triple-blind mediumship research
C Battista, N Gauvrit, & EP LeBel (2015)
The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case Against Life After Death. M. Martin & K. Augustine (Eds.) Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
21

1K 133
Preprint
Conceptual
Enhancing transparency of the research process to increase accuracy of findings: A guide for relationship researchers
L Campbell, TJ Loving, & EP LeBel (2014)
Personal Relationships
19
Replications 2
Big secrets do not necessarily cause hills to appear steeper
EP LeBel & CJ Wilbur (2014)
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Preregistration
Public Study Materials
Public Data
Public Code
Reporting Standards
Study complies with the Basic 4 (at submission) reporting standard:
  1. Excluded data (subjects/observations): Full details reported in article.
  2. Experimental conditions: Full details reported in article.
  3. Outcome measures: Full details reported in article.
  4. Sample size determination: Full details reported in article.
46
Replications 2
Heightened sensitivity to temperature cues in highly anxiously attached individuals: Real or elusive phenomenon?
EP LeBel & L Campbell (2013)
Psychological Science

Preregistration
Public Study Materials
Public Data
Public Code
Reporting Standards
Studies comply with the Basic 4 (retroactive) reporting standard:
  1. Excluded data (subjects/observations): Full details reported in article.
  2. Experimental conditions: Full details reported in article.
  3. Outcome measures: Full details reported in article.
  4. Sample size determination: Full details reported in preregistered protocol.
Date of retroactive disclosure: October 1, 2013.
77
Conceptual
PsychDisclosure.org: Grassroots support for reforming reporting standards in psychology
EP LeBel, D Borsboom, R Giner-Sorolla, F Hasselman, ... , & CT Smith (2013)
Perspectives on Psychological Science
10
Original
The interactive role of implicit and explicit partner evaluations on ongoing affective and behavioral romantic realities
EP LeBel & L Campbell (2013)
Social Psychological and Personality Science

Reporting Standards
Study complies with the Basic 7 (retroactive) reporting standard.


Date of retroactive disclosure: February 15, 2018.
Retroactive disclosure statement

345
Conceptual
An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the [replicability] of psychological science
AA Aarts, ... , EP LeBel, ... , & BA Nosek (2012)
Perspectives on Psychological Science
80
Conceptual
Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments
SV Paunonen & EP LeBel (2012)
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Public Code
140
Conceptual
Fearing the future of empirical psychology: Bem's (2011) evidence of psi as a case study of deficiencies in modal research practice
EP LeBel & KR Peters (2011)
Review of General Psychology
95
Conceptual
Sexy but often unreliable: Impact of unreliability on the replicability of experimental findings involving implicit measures
EP LeBel & SV Paunonen (2011)
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Public Code
Conceptual
Metric calibration of psychological instruments: Utility and feasibility
EP LeBel (2011)
Saarbrucken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

18
Original
Attitude accessibility as a moderator of implicit and explicit self-esteem correspondence
EP LeBel (2010)
Self and Identity

Public Study Materials
557 57
Public Data
557 57
Public Code
557 57
Reporting Standards
Study complies with the Basic 7 (retroactive) reporting standard.


Date of retroactive disclosure: February 15, 2018.
Retroactive disclosure statement

94
Reanalysis
How to find what's in a name: Scrutinizing the optimality of five scoring algorithms for the name-letter task
EP LeBel & B Gawronski (2009)
European Journal of Personality

Public Data
Public Code
50
Original
Implicit partner affect, relationship satisfaction, and the prediction of romantic breakup
EP LeBel & L Campbell (2009)
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

256
Original
Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not
B Gawronski & EP LeBel (2008)
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

296
Conceptual
What do implicit measures tell us? Scrutinizing the validity of three common assumptions
B Gawronski, EP LeBel, & KR Peters (2007)
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Working Papers
581 70
Preprint
Replications 2
Replication difficulties of Payne, Hall, Cameron, and Bishara's (2010) multinomial processing tree model of the affect misattribution procedure
C Tobin* & EP LeBel (2014) *Student co-author
Unpublished manuscript, Montclair State University.

Preregistration
Public Data
Public Code
Conceptual
Modeling mechanism heterogeneity in the affect misattribution procedure: A hierarchical latent-class multinomial processing tree model approach
EP LeBel & C Stahl (2013)
Unpublished manuscript, Montclair State University.

Research-Related Media Coverage

The Science "Reproducibility Crisis" -- And What Can Be Done About It (The Conversation, March 15, 2017)

How the Reproducibility Crisis in Academia is Affecting Scientific Research (Forbes Magazine, February 9, 2017)

Why Academic Research is So Unpredictable and What We Can Do to Fix It (Huffington Post, February 9, 2017)

Why is so much research dodgy? (The Guardian, October 17, 2016)

Effect of Commitment on Forgiveness Investigated in Large-Scale Replication Project (APS Press Release, September 30, 2016)

The 7 biggest problems facing science, according to 270 scientists (Vox, September 7, 2016)

We need to talk about the bad science being funded (The Conversation, July 18, 2016)

Why so much science research is flawed -- and what to do about it (New Scientist, April 13, 2016)

Sloppy Science: Are Sketchy Practices in the Lab to Blame for the Replication Crisis in Psychology Research? (Slate Magazine, March 21, 2016)

Does social science have a replication crisis? (The Washington Post, March 9, 2016)

The six most interesting psychology papers of 2015 (The New Yorker, December 26, 2015)

Whistle-blower scientist wins $10K prize (London Free Press, December 14, 2015)

Make Science More Reliable, Win Cash Prizes: Honoring young researchers who champion rigorous, transparent research is a small step towards changing the culture of science. (The Atlantic, December 10, 2015)

Taxpayer-funded research agencies 'need to wake up' (London Free Press, September 20, 2015)

London scientist Etienne LeBel has exposed questionable work of senior researchers (London Free Press, Stratford Beacon Herald, St. Thomas Times, September 5, 2015)

'Hobo scientist' presses for truth in journals (Ottawa Citizen, September 5, 2015)

Scientists' claims fail rebel's smell test (Sarnia Observer, September 5, 2015)

We tried to reproduce 100 published psychological studies -- the results were abysmal (National Post, August 28, 2015)

Of 100 Published Psychology Studies, Less Than Half Could Be Reproduced Successfully (Popular Science, August 27, 2015)

Study delivers bleak verdict on validity of psychology experiment results (The Guardian, August 27, 2015)

How Reliable Are Psychology Studies? (The Atlantic, August 27, 2015)

Replication Gone Wrong (The Scientist, May 29, 2014)

A happy marriage? It's all about gut feelings (Skeptical appraisal of) (The Telegraph, November 28, 2013)

Cleaning up science (The New Yorker, December 21, 2012)

Can We Trust Psychological Research? (Time Magazine, July 17, 2012)

Older Essays

EP LeBel (2005). The effect of subliminal self-affirmation on stereotype activation. Unpublished Honors thesis, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

EP LeBel (2004). The vanity construct re-examined: LeBel's vanity scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

EP LeBel (2004). Semantic priming in the dual task paradigm. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

EP LeBel (2003). Need for cognition and attributions in intimate relationships. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

EP LeBel (2003). Effects of physical attractiveness on relation initiation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

EP LeBel (2003). Human mate poaching and enticement processes revisited. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

EP LeBel (2003). Prosperous deviance: Drug trafficking. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

EP LeBel (2002). Creativity and mood disorders: Both deviances? Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo. PsyArXiv Preprint

Creative Commons License